NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

The speed bump you can't use: 288 GB/s with an 8 GB lid. Faster than the 4060, but the models that fit didn't change — the 16 GB sibling is the card this one exists to shadow.

8 GB GDDR6 288 GB/s 128-bit bus 160 W TDP

Technical specifications

GPU die
AD106
CUDA cores
4352
Boost clock
~2.54 GHz
VRAM
8 GB GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
Memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
PCIe
4.0 x16
NVLink
none
TDP
160 W
Release
Jun 2023

What these specs mean for llama.cpp

A faster 8 GB card

The AD106 moves the bus to 288 GB/s — a step over the 4060's 272 — and the 4352 cores make prompt processing the best in the 8 GB tier (~400–500 t/s on small models). Token generation: ~40–54 t/s on 8B, ~21–29 t/s on 13B Q4. All of it is inside an 8 GB envelope, which is the point: the 4060 Ti 8G is the fastest version of a small card.

The lid

Same 8 GB math as every card in this tier: 8B at full quality, 13B Q4 at short context, 27B never. The extra speed makes the 13B squeeze more tolerable, but the VRAM decision is identical to the 4060's.

Why two 4060 Tis exist

NVIDIA sold the same AD106 with 16 GB for a modest premium. For LLM work that changes the model tier, not the speed tier — which is why, on this site, the 16 GB version gets the recommendation and this page exists mainly to help you avoid buying the wrong one.

Buy warning If the 8 GB and 16 GB versions are within ~$60–100 of each other at your local price, the 16 GB is the buy. Same silicon, same bandwidth, double the models. The 8 GB only wins when it is clearly cheaper.

The MTP question: if your model ships a built-in multi-token-prediction head (Qwen 3.5/3.6/3.8, Gemma 4), the one-flag speculative pass (--spec-type draft-mtp --spec-draft-n-max 2 --parallel 1) is worth +40–70% (estimated) on token generation here; no per-card A/B in the record; the estimate leans on the low-bandwidth end where n-max 2 gains are largest. The price is ~0.6–2 GB of VRAM, the output is bit-identical to the unaccelerated run, and models without MTP heads (Llama class) see nothing. Full tuning rules in the MTP guide.

Expected performance (Q4_K_M, single GPU)

ModelSize on GPUToken genToken gen (MTP est.)Prompt proc.Fits?
8B (Llama 3.1 8B, Mistral)~4.9 GB~40–54 t/s~56–92 t/s~400–500 t/s✅ Q8_0, 16K+ ctx
13B Q4_K_M~8.5 GB~21–29 t/s~30–49 t/s~350–450 t/s⚠️ tight, short ctx only
13B Q3_K_M~6.7 GB~24–33 t/s~34–56 t/s~400 t/s✅ with quality loss
27B~19 GB———❌ no

MTP est. = rough prior with --spec-type draft-mtp for models that ship MTP heads (Qwen 3.5/3.6/3.8, Gemma 4); Llama-class models get no MTP speedup. Actual gains depend on model, quant, context length, llama.cpp build and your card — sweep --spec-draft-n-max, don't trust the column blindly. MTP guide →

Figures assume full offload (-ngl 99), ~8K context and batch 2048. Token speed tracks the memory bus almost linearly, so treat ranges as class estimates — your llama.cpp build and the model's attention layout shift them.

27B models (Qwen class) — Q4 / Q5 / Q6 / Q8

QuantGGUF size1× 4060 Ti 8G (8 GB)2× 4060 Ti 8G (16 GB)
Q4_K_M~19 GB❌ ~11 GB over❌ ~3 GB over
Q5_K_M~22 GB❌❌
Q6_K~25 GB❌❌
Q8_0~33 GB❌❌

Identical to the rest of the 8 GB tier: nothing 27B-class fits until 4× (32 GB), where Q4_K_M runs at roughly ~9–12 t/s at 4–8K context. Paired 8 GB cards are a 16 GB card with extra parts — the 16 GB siblings do the same job for less.

Practical tips

Multi-card: 2×, 3×, 4×

PCIe 4.0, ~25–35% split tax, 8 GB per tile — the 4060's arithmetic, slightly faster.

BuildGPU powerVRAM13B Q427B Q4_K_M
2× 4060 Ti 8G320 W16 GB~29–38 t/s❌ ~3 GB over
4× 4060 Ti 8G640 W32 GB~50–65 t/s~9–12 t/s, 4–8K ctx

The 4-way build reaches 27B Q4 at a usable-ish clip. It also costs 640 W and four slots to do what two 16 GB cards do at 320 W.

The 16 GB shadow Every build on this table has a 16 GB twin that's cheaper, cooler and faster. This is the site's most redundant card — fine if it's cheap, wrong if it isn't.

Offloading (CPU RAM)

When a model won't fit, -ngl N parks the tail layers on the CPU. The mental model that saves pain: offloaded layers don't run at a fraction of GPU speed — they run at CPU speed. Handy moves: peel the last 2–4 layers off to reclaim ~0.5–1 GB of VRAM for almost nothing; keep MoE experts on CPU with --n-cpu-moe; park the output embedding with -ot output=CPU on big models. Budget 32 GB system RAM for 27B-class offload, 64 GB for 70B. And never offload the KV cache — the session becomes unusable.

2-card example llama-server -m 13b-q4_k_m.gguf -ngl 99 -sm layer -c 8192 --tensor-split 1,1

Recommended llama.cpp command

llama-server -m llama-3.1-8b-q6_k.gguf -ngl 99 -c 8192 -b 2048 -ub 2048 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080

Verdict

Fastest 8 GB Ada, and the series' most avoidable purchase: the 16 GB sibling costs a little more and runs meaningfully different models at the same speed. As a cheap fast 8B box it's good; as an LLM card, it's a footnotes entry.

← RTX 4060 next: RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB →